summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/articles
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'articles')
-rw-r--r--articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md2
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md b/articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md
index da84ed7..ee1597c 100644
--- a/articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md
+++ b/articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md
@@ -10,5 +10,7 @@ Conceptually, CoCs are flawed as it misses the concept of person's beliefs. No p
Unfortunately, CoC used in many open source projects does exactly what has been told above, it actively targets specific groups of people who are getting disadvantaged through these set of rules, just because their views and opinions aren't considered "ideal" by the project maintainers. This causes unnecessary conflicts within the community itself, while the unity weakens.
+While introducing a document for enforcing rules for prohibiting on controversial views may seem like a good idea at first, however it can quickly mutate into containing rules which prohibits for even expressing normal beliefs, affecting you as well in the end.
+
### The Solution
At the end, our views are different from one another. We may agree on something but disagree on other. Hence at the very least, we should just simply agree to disagree and walk away. It shouldn't matter if a person is a conservative or liberal, black or white, straight or gay, or anything in between, his or her skills shouldn't go to waste just because of the differences, while keeping the concept of the freedom of expression thriving.