summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/articles
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorArnav Bhatt <arnav@ghativega.in>2023-01-01 01:49:32 +0530
committerArnav Bhatt <arnav@ghativega.in>2023-01-01 01:49:32 +0530
commitcd0bcacd1d4606ca14477595a621d0befc90cf3e (patch)
treee6166c2f9bb0ae7a702f1b769a00c3f2514835aa /articles
parent459aa3925a21cf4b74c7e5c936a5e811eada5f74 (diff)
test
Diffstat (limited to 'articles')
-rw-r--r--articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md b/articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md
index 9233272..24f4ac9 100644
--- a/articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md
+++ b/articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md
@@ -11,4 +11,4 @@ Conceptually, CoCs are flawed as it misses the concept of person's beliefs. No p
Unfortunately, CoC used in many open source projects does exactly what has been told above, it actively targets specific groups of people who are getting disadvantaged through these set of rules, just because their views and opinions aren't considered "ideal" by the project maintainers. This causes unnecessary conflicts within the community itself, while the unity weakens.
### The Solution
-At the end, our views are different from one another. We may agree on something but disagree on other. Hence at the very least, we should just simply agree to disagree and walk away. It shouldn't matter if a person is a conservative or liberal, black or white, straight or gay, or anything in between, his or her skills shouldn't go to waste just because of the differences, while keeping the concept of the free speech thriving.
+At the end, our views are different from one another. We may agree on something but disagree on other. Hence at the very least, we should just simply agree to disagree and walk away. It shouldn't matter if a person is a conservative or liberal, black or white, straight or gay, or anything in between, his or her skills shouldn't go to waste just because of the differences, while keeping the concept of the freedom of expression thriving.