From 459aa3925a21cf4b74c7e5c936a5e811eada5f74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnav Bhatt Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2023 01:48:59 +0530 Subject: test --- articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'articles') diff --git a/articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md b/articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md index 78fe0e8..9233272 100644 --- a/articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md +++ b/articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md @@ -11,4 +11,4 @@ Conceptually, CoCs are flawed as it misses the concept of person's beliefs. No p Unfortunately, CoC used in many open source projects does exactly what has been told above, it actively targets specific groups of people who are getting disadvantaged through these set of rules, just because their views and opinions aren't considered "ideal" by the project maintainers. This causes unnecessary conflicts within the community itself, while the unity weakens. ### The Solution -At the end, our views are different from one another. We may agree on something but disagree on other. Hence at the very least, we should just simply agree to disagree and walk away from a conversation. It shouldn't matter if a person is a conservative or liberal, black or white, straight or gay, or anything in between, his or her skills shouldn't go to waste just because of the differences, while the concept of the free speech thriving. +At the end, our views are different from one another. We may agree on something but disagree on other. Hence at the very least, we should just simply agree to disagree and walk away. It shouldn't matter if a person is a conservative or liberal, black or white, straight or gay, or anything in between, his or her skills shouldn't go to waste just because of the differences, while keeping the concept of the free speech thriving. -- cgit v1.2.3