diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md b/articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md index 9233272..24f4ac9 100644 --- a/articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md +++ b/articles/code-of-conduct-does-more-harm-than-good.md @@ -11,4 +11,4 @@ Conceptually, CoCs are flawed as it misses the concept of person's beliefs. No p Unfortunately, CoC used in many open source projects does exactly what has been told above, it actively targets specific groups of people who are getting disadvantaged through these set of rules, just because their views and opinions aren't considered "ideal" by the project maintainers. This causes unnecessary conflicts within the community itself, while the unity weakens. ### The Solution -At the end, our views are different from one another. We may agree on something but disagree on other. Hence at the very least, we should just simply agree to disagree and walk away. It shouldn't matter if a person is a conservative or liberal, black or white, straight or gay, or anything in between, his or her skills shouldn't go to waste just because of the differences, while keeping the concept of the free speech thriving. +At the end, our views are different from one another. We may agree on something but disagree on other. Hence at the very least, we should just simply agree to disagree and walk away. It shouldn't matter if a person is a conservative or liberal, black or white, straight or gay, or anything in between, his or her skills shouldn't go to waste just because of the differences, while keeping the concept of the freedom of expression thriving. |